Working With Crowds Historical Archive

Love Parade Trial Duisburg 2010 · Criminal Proceedings 2017–2020

A historical archive of reporting and translated material relating to the criminal proceedings that followed the Love Parade crowd disaster in Duisburg, Germany.

Incident
24 July 2010
Duisburg, Germany
Fatalities
21
People lost their lives
Injured
At least 652
Many seriously injured
Trial
184 days
2017–2020

Background

From the 2010 disaster to the criminal proceedings

On 24 July 2010, the Love Parade was held on the site of a former freight yard in Duisburg. A critical crowd situation developed around the access and exit system serving the event site. Twenty-one people died and hundreds more were injured.

The subsequent investigation and legal process extended over several years. The criminal trial began on 8 December 2017. Proceedings were initially brought against six former employees of the City of Duisburg and four employees of event organiser Lopavent.

The proceedings examined a complex combination of planning, approval, access arrangements, crowd movement, operational decision-making, communication and actions taken on the day of the event.

Proceedings against seven of the ten defendants were discontinued in February 2019. The case continued against three defendants until 4 May 2020, when the remaining proceedings were also discontinued. The criminal trial therefore concluded without a judgment.

24 July 2010

Love Parade disaster

Twenty-one people died and hundreds were injured during the event in Duisburg.

8 December 2017

Criminal trial begins

Proceedings opened against ten defendants connected with the city administration and event organiser.

6 February 2019

Proceedings narrowed

Proceedings against seven defendants were discontinued. The trial continued against three defendants.

4 May 2020

Trial concludes

The remaining proceedings were discontinued after 184 trial days, bringing the criminal case to an end without a judgment.

About the material

Reading the archive

The pages were created while the proceedings were taking place. They should therefore be read as a historical record of contemporary reporting rather than as a retrospective legal judgment.

Translation

A substantial proportion of the archive was originally translated into English from German-language reporting. Translation wording may not reproduce German legal or technical terminology precisely. Original source reporting should therefore be consulted where precise interpretation is required.

Historical material

Statements contained within contemporary reports represent the evidence, observations or opinions being reported at that stage of the proceedings. Later evidence or legal developments may have provided additional context.

Crowd-safety learning

The archive contains extensive material relevant to crowd planning, access and egress, flow management, command, communication, security deployment and multi-agency coordination. It should be considered alongside current professional guidance rather than used as operational guidance by itself.

Respect for those affected

The archive concerns an incident in which people lost their lives and many others were injured or traumatised. Material has therefore been retained for educational and historical purposes with appropriate respect for those affected.

Translate »